Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 771 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900 - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 257 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$549.99 vs CA$1676.73
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
245
95.3307392996109%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1676.73
32%
Buy for CA$1,676.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Buy for CA$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
66.15446825717751%
Multi-Core
14008
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |