Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 477 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 23 than Core i3-10105 - 237 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$159.99 vs CA$2287.88
- Up to 93% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$0.71 vs CA$9.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.65/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$2287.88
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,287.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |