Buy on Amazon
CA$2,000
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2548 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 18% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G1610 - 216 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$2000
100%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core, 64-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.03911980440098%
Multi-Core
739
5.275556824671616%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
