Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 837 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 111 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$375.0 vs CA$2420.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$3.64 vs CA$21.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 180 vs 280 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$21.8/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$2420
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9244 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Castle Peak | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 12 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |