Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700 - 60 vs 57 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$398.88 vs CA$1161.69
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
60
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1161.69
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,161.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Buy for CA$398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1581
94.84103179364128%
Multi-Core
7010
52.639483367124726%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |