Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 2497 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Hogwarts Legacy than FX-8150 - 84 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
77
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Colfax | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |