Buy on Amazon
CA$1,881
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $383
Availability
MSRP in USD: $383
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1954 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-4702MQ - 223 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 37 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1881
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for CA$1,881 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Colfax | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 37 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
