Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1190 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G6900 - 284 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$113.5 vs CA$1783.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1783
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,783 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76609 minutes ago
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76608 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
77.04304429195258%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |