Buy on Amazon
CA$1,783
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2227 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than FX-4130 - 172 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1783
100%
FPS Winner
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for CA$1,783 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Colfax | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 250 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
