Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 130 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 230 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$465.0 vs CA$1181.07
- Up to 62% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$2.02 vs CA$5.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
223
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.3/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
39%
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$465
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$465 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |