Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-7920X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-7920X is 355 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-7920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 130 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$600.75 vs CA$1181.07
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$4.62 vs CA$9.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
128
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.23/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
50%
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |