Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1222 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 192 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$814.06 vs CA$1181.07
- Up to 36% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$4.24 vs CA$6.6 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
179
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.6/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
68%
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$814.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$814.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |