Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1587 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 189 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$479.97 vs CA$1181.07
- Up to 61% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$2.54 vs CA$6.45 per FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
183
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.45/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
40%
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |