Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700 is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 3% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 104 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$459.63 vs CA$593.83
- Up to 25% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$4.42 vs CA$5.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
97.11538461538461%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.88/FPS
75.17006802721087%
Price, CA$
CA$593.83
77%
Buy for CA$593.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
104
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$459.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$459.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |