Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 837 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$369.9 vs CA$1580.77
- Up to 74% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$2.0 vs CA$7.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 180 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 207 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 48 vs 24 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.64/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$1580.77
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Whitehaven | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |