Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 457 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - CA$303.46 vs CA$1300.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i7-6950X - CA$1.54 vs CA$6.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 199 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
197
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10456 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.53/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$1300
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |