Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 15% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 150 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 135 vs 170 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$718.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$718.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 135 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |