Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1456 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 162 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$718.98 vs CA$1575.5
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$4.44 vs CA$12.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 170 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$718.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$718.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
128
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.31/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$1575.5
45%
Buy for CA$1,575.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raphael | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 48 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 250 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |