Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 73% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4100 - 761 vs 439 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$39.96 vs CA$729.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$0.09 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
761
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$729
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
439
58%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$39.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$39.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |