Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 425 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G6900 - 158 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$103.99 vs CA$499.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$0.71 vs CA$3.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.16/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$499
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$103.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |