Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2256 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Rocket League than FX-8370 - 759 vs 675 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of FX-8370
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$210.00 vs CA$499.00
- Up to 53% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$0.31 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
759
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$499
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 377 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
675
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 377 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |