Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 2945 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than Core i7-3820 - 161 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Renoir | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
