Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 618 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen 9 3900X - 237 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$304.99 vs CA$635.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$1.29 vs CA$2.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for CA$635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |