Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Ryzen 7 7840U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 568 days older than Ryzen 7 7840U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 7840U - 128 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7840U - 24 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$405.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$405.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 26th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
May 26th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
4 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon 780M | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |