Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 6800HS outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 6800HS is 2739 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4160T - 139 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 7 6800HS
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
