Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2758 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 140 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$442.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$442.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Not Available | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |