Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4144 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3240T - 140 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$350
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |