Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800H outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800H is 1295 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 202 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 7 4800H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
