Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 3191 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 9% better in Death Stranding than FX-6100 - 231 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - CA$84.01 vs CA$776.87
- Up to 88% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 7 3800XT - CA$0.4 vs CA$3.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.36/FPS
11.904761904761905%
Price, CA$
CA$776.87
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$776.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
212
91.77489177489177%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |