Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$315
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |