Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 262 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Ryzen 7 3700U - 184 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Single-Core
885
76.82291666666666%
Multi-Core
2555
52.778351580252014%
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Picasso | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |