Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 7 2700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 56 days older than Ryzen 7 2700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 18% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 7 2700U - 104 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700U - 16 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
104
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65764 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Single-Core
810
69.34931506849315%
Multi-Core
2419
41.75008629616845%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |