Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 231 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 2700 - 166 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$200.98 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$1.21 vs CA$1.72 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |