Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G is 3193 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
- Performs up to 47% better in Starfield than Core i3-3240 - 66 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2021
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
29.20400632577754%
Multi-Core
1137
16.20350577169731%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Cezanne | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
