Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2985 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 32% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-3220 - 120 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$36.66 vs CA$218.33
- Up to 78% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$0.4 vs CA$1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$218.33
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
91
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |