Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2992 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4130 - 216 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$218.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$218.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |