Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 668 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 706 vs 543 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS - 24 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
706
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$408.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$408.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |