Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1812 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4370 - 183 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$85.99 vs CA$899.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.5 vs CA$4.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.91/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$899
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11217 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
172
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |