Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1893 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-4150 - 246 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
61.09154929577465%
Multi-Core
2047
28.343949044585987%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |