Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 912 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G6900 - 216 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$112.98 vs CA$899.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.53 vs CA$4.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.16/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$899
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12642 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |