Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 21% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8320 - 148 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$111.14 vs CA$442.1
- Up to 70% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.91 vs CA$2.99 per FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.99/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$442.1
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$442.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7168 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
122
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |