Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$380.0 vs CA$418.54
- Up to 9% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900 - CA$2.48 vs CA$2.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3600X - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
153
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$380
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$380 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18763 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.72/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$418.54
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$418.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |