Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 294 days newer than Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 3500X - 124 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 64 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$40.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$4967.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$4,967.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5067 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Single-Core
1555
93.95770392749245%
Multi-Core
5850
40.126208930653675%
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 24th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
6 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |