Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 323 days newer than Ryzen 5 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3500U - 427 vs 389 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 48 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
427
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1670
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,670 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |