Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1368 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-4160 - 242 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$98.88 vs CA$290.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.41 vs CA$1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
242
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$290
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11029 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
239
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |