Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - CA$88.39 vs CA$760.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - CA$7.14 vs CA$9.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 52% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2600 - 82 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
54
66%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$88.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$88.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
82
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.27/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$760
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$760 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |