Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 673 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2500X - 135 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 64 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$36.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$4967.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$4,967.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
66.64652567975831%
Multi-Core
3801
26.071747033404215%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |