Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 3409 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 3% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Phenom II X4 925 - 212 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
29.011786038077968%
Multi-Core
930
24.467245461720598%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Deneb |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
