Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1808 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3770S - 288 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$132.38 vs CA$307.08
- Up to 55% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$0.48 vs CA$1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
288
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
44.85981308411214%
Price, CA$
CA$307.08
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$307.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
278
96.52777777777779%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$132.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$132.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
59.57257346393588%
Multi-Core
2234
46.873688627780105%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |