Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1076 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1840 - 102 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$41.21 vs CA$380.55
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$380.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76907 minutes ago
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
44.96883348174532%
Multi-Core
854
17.91859001258917%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |